up-imapproxy (Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-20)
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Fri Apr 21 12:32:54 UTC 2006
Am Freitag, den 21.04.2006, 14:18 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:16:43 -0000, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is in bugzilla as
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/185729 (and in the tracker bugs, too)
>
> but the package maintainer has not responded in over a month.
He responded to me once in private; I forwarded it privately to a
potential maintainer.
> As soon as the buildsys server is reachable
> again, the packages will be removed from the repository, since they are broken
> anyway.
Agreed
> Does it make sense to keep the fc4 packages? (I don't think so)
Why do you think so?
I vote for leaving it around in FC4 (but if there are good reasons to
remove it from FC4 I'm fine with removing it).
CU
thl
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list