[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404





------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com  2006-04-24 12:14 EST -------
Hi Warren - I agree, there's no real problem, technically - in fact, that's what
I've done. I'm just worried from the user perspective. Perhaps I am worrying too
much though, given that the user would have to install muse and emacs-muse
(and/or xemacs-muse) and so should know to look for a module called muse and not
emacs-muse.

I would like to add though, that I think the approach used here (muse,
emacs-muse, xemacs-muse from a muse srcrpm) is much more preferable to having
muse muse-emacs and muse-xemacs which is what the mew model would give.
Prepending the interpreter is following the current guidelines.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.