Security Response Team / EOL

Fri Apr 28 12:54:20 UTC 2006

On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:40:43PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 28.04.2006, 14:20 +0200 schrieb Axel Thimm:
> > o Can there be consolidation of forces in fedora (core) legacy and
> >   fedora extras legacy?
> 
> "fedora extras legacy" is IMHO the wrong term -- I don't like it. I
> would prefer if we could avoid it. Why? See the discussion about the
> term "Legacy" that was on fedora-devel some weeks (months?) ago. 

I agree, I never really liked the name (it sounds like a burden), I'm
just using it to make the context clear.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060428/90d5f002/attachment.sig>