Security Response Team / EOL

[Michael Schwendt]

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:45:04 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:

> The packagers should be trust to do things right.

> Of course, but a packager that add new packages to legacy branches 
> should guarantee that he (or a co-maintainer) is willing to do the 
> maintainance, just like he guarantee that he is willing to maintain the
> package in current branches.

That is contradictory to what you've written earlier. Here you talk
of "guarantees". Earlier you went the "no guarantees, no promises,
no warranty" road. Doesn't work for me.