Ignacio / php-json
Brandon Holbrook
fedora at theholbrooks.org
Sat Aug 19 20:57:10 UTC 2006
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 14:28:42 -0500, Brandon Holbrook wrote:
>
>
>>>> Ouch, may I ask what the story is here? Judging from the list of
>>>> packages he maintains (search for ivazquez at ivazquez.net in owners.list).
>>>>
>
>
>
>> I've gone ahead and answered
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198564 for
>> Ignacio's php-json package. Bumped to latest upstream and successfully
>> built.
>>
>
> Important: I've excluded the results of this build job from the next push.
>
> If you read the bug report, the reporter mentions that Ignacio has
> published a working/newer version for FC5. Your changes to the devel
> branch in CVS differ from Ignacio's FC-5 version. Further, you mention
> a "New Maintainer" in the %changelog, which is not official yet for
> this package, is it? I'd like to see the following policy in action
>
>
...I guess I'm a little confused here. The bug reports mentions nothing
about a working version for FC5, only that a working version of 1.2.1 is
in FEdevel and the requestor would like to see that update backported
for FC5, which I did. Granted, I also did some general housekeeping
while I was in there, like consistent macro usage and the new PHP Macros
approved by the Packaging Committe. I wasn't trying to be misleading by
putting "New Maintainer" in the changelog, I just wanted to highlight
the fact that I was a different guy from the previous maintainer. Are
these what you are referring to by "changes that differ"? I haven't
made any changes to the devel branch, although I was considering
applying the same PHP housekeeping. I'll put everything on hold until
this gets explored a little further.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/AWOL_Maintainers
>
> rather than an immediate package take-over. Sorry for the pain.
>
>
Which is why I asked if we were ready for the takeover process, rather
than assuming so. When somebody suggested that we start taking bug
reports, I though that might mean we had jumped to the package takeover,
so I asked for clarification.
>> Are we ready to go ahead and start the 3-day
>> FESco-approval-with-no-objections for his packages? Anybody else
>> interested in php-json?
>>
>> Also, it seems since my sponsorship a little over a week ago I still
>> don't have any rights in bugzilla.
>>
>
> Have you joined fedora_bugs group?
>
>
That was my problem, I joined "fedorabugs" instead of "fedora_bugs".
Now when I try to join fedora_bugs I get a Python AttributeError in
get_allowed_group_actions().
>> How long does it take for new
>> packages (php-shout) to appear
>>
>
> Build job 14359 won't appear, since I moved the results out of the
> needsign queue. I can restore the results, but would like to see an
> official "okay". Other jobs are published as soon as they are signed and
> pushed by somebody. Today's push is in progress, btw.
>
No sweat :)
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list