SPF failures nuke fedora-extras* msgs from redhat.com

Wed Aug 23 01:08:31 UTC 2006

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:33:46AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I disagree with you on SPF in many regards, but this part I totally agree
> > with. Having a package behave totally differently depending simply on the
> > *presence* of a perl module is bad behavior.
> That's true of a lot of other (optional) perl modules in spamassassin.

Oh, I know.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>