Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-08-25

Christopher Stone chris.stone at gmail.com
Mon Aug 28 03:24:13 UTC 2006


On 8/27/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 02:57:18 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > MS> What I meant is that building a broken package doesn't change the
> > MS> situation much. Now pyxdg is available again, but still broken and
> > MS> hence still breaking fluxbox. ;o)
> >
> > I don't really understand what is broken.
>
> Bugzilla has the info for almost a year now. Just query the pyxdg bug
> reports. That is the least thing you ought to do before touching somebody's
> package.

Erm, why would anyone care about an FC3 bug?  I thought all FC3 bugs
were closed anyway?




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list