coverity code checker in Extras
Jeff Spaleta
jspaleta at gmail.com
Thu Aug 31 16:22:23 UTC 2006
On 8/31/06, Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> wrote:
> Same thing in principle. Why does Coverity need to be in our build
> system? It could very well work asynchronously outside of Fedora from
> our SRPMS.
I would really prefer this sort of outside the fenceline cooperation.
I don't have any problem with Coverity hosting a service that chews on
our publicly accessible data like the srpms and then spits back
reports to us (in an open file format of course :->).
Is it even worthwhile to think about anything other than asynchronous
scans? Wouldn't this slow down build process significantly if these
scans were tied into the building of every package?
-jef
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list