duplicate filenames in the different packages [qstat vs. torque]

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Fri Aug 4 10:48:04 UTC 2006


On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:19:25 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> Hi, folks!
> 
> Tonight I've received the following bug
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201279
> 
> I'm packager of the qstat tool. But the torque (in torque-client) 
> already consists the /usr/bin/qstat.
> 
> And main question here: what should I do?

In general, it is always bad if packages pollute the namespace of a global
search location like /usr/bin with a filename that is not related to the
package name.

Why isn't this program called "torque-qstat"? You could patch it and
rename it like that. What is the sense in creating such a short and
generic name like "qstat"? Is the program useful outside of "torque"?
Could it be placed in /usr/libexec/torque/qstat instead if not renamed?

Btw, I don't like the growing tendency among packagers to suggest explicit
Conflicts in Fedora Extras in favour of working on making packages coexist
nicely whether with the help of upstream or not.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list