rpmlint and double %changelog entry [ ex rpms/ssmtp/FC-5 ssmtp-bcc-fix.patch, ..., ssmtp.spec, 1.2, 1.3]
lonely wolf
wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro
Sun Dec 10 10:56:02 UTC 2006
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/ssmtp/FC-5 ssmtp-bcc-fix.patch, NONE, 1.1 ssmtp-password-leak.patch, NONE, 1.1 ssmtp-ssl.certificate.nomatch.patch, NONE, 1.1 ssmtp.spec, 1.2, 1.3
- Next message (by thread): rpms/gpsd/FC-6 gpsd.spec,1.8,1.9
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 12/10/2006 04:46 AM, Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 03:40 +0200, lonely wolf wrote:
>
>>> Now you have an extra %changelog section in your spec. Though I don't
>>> know for certain if that causes problems (or what problems it may cause
>>> if it does), I'd recommend reconciling that so as to have only one
>>> %changelog section. :)
>>>
>>>
>> Nice catch. Shouldn't rpmlint (version 0.77) find that ? 'cause I did
>> test both src.rpm and binary rpm :(
>>
>
> Doesn't seem like it does. Should we file a bug about that perhaps?
>
Since neither rpmlint 0.78 catches this, I have filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219068
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/ssmtp/FC-5 ssmtp-bcc-fix.patch, NONE, 1.1 ssmtp-password-leak.patch, NONE, 1.1 ssmtp-ssl.certificate.nomatch.patch, NONE, 1.1 ssmtp.spec, 1.2, 1.3
- Next message (by thread): rpms/gpsd/FC-6 gpsd.spec,1.8,1.9
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list