Resurrecting tetex-beamer

[Peter Gordon]

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 21:54 -0500, Michel Salim wrote:
> 2006/12/1, Michel Salim <michel.salim at gmail.com>:
> Just checked and there's no Bugzilla entry for the review request.
> tetex-beamer *is* listed in owners.list, though.
> 
> Should I ask for a review of the updated package, and only after it
> pass request the branches?
> 
Yes. Please do the review request before importing it, so that we can
ensure the package's QA stuff, especially if it was dropped for a few
releases. 

> (and what happens if one were to run cvs-import.sh and the package is
> already in the tree, but does not have a -devel branch, as is the case
> here)

IIRC, it will create a new devel/ branch, but you need to use the "-b
<branch>" option if you're importing it into a branch that already
exists.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061201/b3408a0e/attachment.sig>