Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-12-06

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Sat Dec 9 17:44:33 UTC 2006


On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:09:25 +0100
bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:36:42 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> 
> > > Summary of broken packages (by owner):
> > 
> > So all the non development broken dependencies are now fixed?
> 
> No, linphone for FE 5 is still broken. I think there's an open ticket
> about it, and IIRC, a library upgrade broke ABI.

Yeah, I have looked at it as well... 

The bug is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201017

Basically the new linphone needs a newer version of speex (which is in
core). The new speex was pushed for fc6, so thats ok now, but fc5 is
still in trouble. 

Unfortunately, the ortp package was upgraded in fc5, and the old
linphone won't build with that version of ortp. ;( 

Hopefully the core speex maintainer will update fc5 and it will get
fixed. 
> 
> > Or this report only is generated against development now?
> 
> As the subject line suggests, the report is just for "development".
> But apart from that, I've broken the main summary report and will need
> to fix it.

ok. Thanks for all the work pointing out these issues... hopefully we
can get them fixed up. 

Is there any easy way to manually run the report locally without
mailing people or the like? It might be usefull when confirming when
issues are fixed before the next push. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20061209/7ae19120/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list