(1/2) Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-12-11
Michael Schwendt
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Tue Dec 12 08:41:06 UTC 2006
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:57:28 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > José Matos wrote:
> >
> >> On Monday 11 December 2006 9:53 pm, Tim Jackson wrote:
> >>> Jose, do you want to go ahead and pick it up? If so, please do.
> >>> Otherwise I guess one of the other maintainers (like me) with stuff
> >>> depending on fltk had better do it...
> >>
> >> I see that Rex picked this package for EPEL. Rex, do you want also to
> >> own
> >> this package for Fedora?
> >
> > I likely will (eventually), if no one else does, since OpenEXR needs it.
>
> I guess that's gonna have to be sooner rather than later, since OpenEXR is
> currently busted (and I can't fix koffice without it).
>
> OK, who was the bozo that yanked fltk from the repo without giving anyone a
> chance to jump in and fix it first? (:
Several months have been enough.
Further, FE development is in bad shape currently anyway. So, it doesn't
hurt to break a few more dependencies. Either fltk in CVS still rebuilds
fine or does not. In case of the latter, it will need a maintainer rather
sooner than later.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list