License Question

[Rex Dieter]

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

>>>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
>>>>>> writes:
> 
> RD> NOPE, not OSI: "All other uses not mentioned here require a
> RD> commercial license."
> 
> The problem is that there's another clause which says "If you're open
> source, you are exempted".  

IMO (of course), still doesn't matter.  OSI requires full redistributability
and no restrictions on usage, period.  This license would prevent usage in
the case of a respun distro (based on Fedora) that included non-OSS bits
for commericial purposes/use, which otherwise would(should!) be perfectly
acceptable.

-- Rex