rpms/ginac/devel ginac.spec,1.2,1.3

[Quentin Spencer]

Ralf Corsepius wrote:

>On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:33 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
>  
>
>>Author: qspencer
>>
>>Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/ginac/devel
>>In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30627
>>
>>Modified Files:
>>	ginac.spec 
>>Log Message:
>>Update URL and fix unpackaged files.
>>
>>
>>Index: ginac.spec
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/ginac/devel/ginac.spec,v
>>retrieving revision 1.2
>>retrieving revision 1.3
>>diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
>>--- ginac.spec	31 Oct 2005 23:23:57 -0000	1.2
>>+++ ginac.spec	2 Feb 2006 16:33:55 -0000	1.3
>>@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
>> Group:          System Environment/Libraries
>> License:        GPL
>> URL:            http://www.ginac.de/
>>-Source0:        ftp://ftpthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/pub/GiNaC/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
>>+Source0:        http://www.ginac.de/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
>> BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
>> 
>> Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
>>@@ -86,24 +86,29 @@
>> 
>> %files devel
>> %defattr(-,root,root)
>>+%doc %{_infodir}/*.info*
>>+%doc %{_mandir}/man?/ginac-config.1*
>>    
>>
>These %doc are redundant, please remove them.
>
>  
>

Redundant how?

>> %{_libdir}/*.a
>>    
>>
>Why are you shipping static libs?
>  
>

I don't know. I modeled my first spec files that included libraries 
after others that were already in Extras, and have just done things that 
way all along (including a few other packages I maintain), but this was 
all before people started preaching the evils of static libs. I guess I 
can remove them.

-Quentin