non building packages list

Toshio Kuratomi toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Thu Feb 2 17:35:29 UTC 2006


On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 03:59 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 19:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/config.log
> 
> Probably a broken configure script:
> 
> The X11 check this configure script uses, checks for libXt (cf.
> X11/Intrinsic.h) instead of libX.
> 
> BR: libXt-devel
> inside of the spec should be applicalbe to work around this issue.
> 
> The actual fix would be to fix the configure script to not look for Xt
> header (X11/Intrinsic.h) but for an X-header.
> 
Thanks Ralf, Kevin, and Jeremy!

I'm looking into whether the configure script needs to be using
AC_PATH_XTRA or if AC_PATH_X is fine.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060202/52f50ccd/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list