[Bug 177507] Review Request: pida
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 8 09:57:55 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507
------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2006-02-08 04:57 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> - This
> >Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")
> is not needed anymore -- works automatically in FC4 and later
alright thats cleaned up now.
> - Don't repeat the name of the package in the beginning of the summary
cosmetical fix done ;)
> - The license doesn't look like GPL
its MIT... fixed
> - Description needs a linebreak after 80 chars
linebreaks done
> - Description might be a bit to long
gotta recheck that. shouldnt be a big problem to make it shorter
> - Change
> Requires: desktop-file-utils
> to
> BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
thats correct and fixed now
> - In the future please add versions in the changelog
also done
> - why "Release: 0.2" and not "Release: 2"?
this has multible reasons. first i dont want to give the impression that the
package is yet really production ready and second of all i wanted to start of
with a clean -1 release once its approved. in my eyes pida is very promising
software but very young yet so it can definitely use some love and care already.
0.3.1 is a useable release if the embedded vim editor is used.
> - saw those warnings when starting pida:
> which: no pydoc in
>
(/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin)
> which: no xemacs in
>
(/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin)
> Are they relevant?
optional components. pida is a framework.
> - In the future please upload the srpms somewhere to the web and post only post
> links to it -- don't attach the packages in bugzilla
alright but unfortunately thats the reason why i dont have the src rpm up yet.
>
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > list of known issues:
> > - usually bicyclerepair would be required to load the python plugins but i left
> > the dependencys out since the plugins (browser/profiler/debugger) dont load
> > anyways. (will be fixed with 0.3.0)
>
> I would add it nevertheless
seems to be not even required anymore. but i will talk back to upstream. going
to clear up the issue until the next src rpm upload.
TODO:
1) do something with the stuff in docs/ folder... maybe it would be nice to pdf
those html manuals. suggestions?
2) get the vim problem fixed (actually i had problems to get the external vim
editor going)
3) build install and split off the in extras/ included gazpacho plugin
4) report all found issues to upstream
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list