Please rebuild your packages in the development tree of Fedora Extras

[Bill Nottingham]

Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta at gmail.com) said: 
> On 2/16/06, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at laiskiainen.org> wrote:
> > Of course the problem with these has been that the SRPM repositories
> > haven't really existed at all (in FC4 and earlier), never mind being set
> > up by default.
> 
> Where is Core and Extras policy stand on how the repo metadata for
> SRPM is going to be handled now? is repodata for SRPM split off in its
> own repodata structure that requires additional repo entries? Last
> time a look..awhile ago... it seemed to be handled inconsistently
> across base and updates-released and extras for fc4.  Is there going
> to be a consistent handling across base,updates,extras for fc5?


See http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/fedora-release/?root=fedora -
this has been changed around some in the past couple of days.

Bill