The Ruby license
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Tue Feb 28 17:35:48 UTC 2006
Looks to me like the sensible thing to do is to modify rpmlint.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I couldn't find any of the valid licenses in rpmlint which matches the
> Ruby license. These days everything in Ruby is dual Ruby/GPL; it it
> acceptable to use just GPL or should "Ruby license" be added to
> rpmlint's list? (If so, I'll file a bug.)
>
> Note that the OSI doesn't list Ruby's license, but Debian accepts it
> as free: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
>
> The license text is at http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt
>
> - J<
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list