Some status and questions about owners file
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Christian.Iseli at licr.org
Wed Feb 1 11:51:06 UTC 2006
Hi folks,
I've added some more checks to my package and BZ ticket checking script, and
now have some questions:
- what happens when a package goes from extras to core ? Should the
"product" column be changed ? The matter is a bit compilcated by the fact
that the package usually remains in extras for the previous/current releases
- what's the general feeling about orphaned packages. Shouldn't they be
removed from the devel repo until a maintainer steps up ?
- there seems to be a sizeable amount of entries in owners file that have no
corresponding package in the devel repo. Should BZ tickets be filed ? The
matter here is a bit complicated because some packages might have been
discontinued for devel but are still provided for older releases. Maybe
there should be a way to indicate this in the owners file...
I guess that's enough questions for now :-)
Below is the current output of the script.
Cheers,
Christian
---
=== About owners file ===
We have 1410 extras packages in owners file.
There are 65 orphans.
Top 10 package owners:
tcallawa at redhat dot com : 88
jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 83
ville dot skytta at iki dot fi : 82
matthias at rpmforge dot net : 70
andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency dot de : 54
rc040203 at freenet dot de : 50
ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 41
rdieter at math dot unl dot edu : 41
gauret at free dot fr : 40
steve at silug dot org : 35
We have 58 orphaned packages available in extras devel:
abe anjuta apg apt arc at-poke bochs camstream cgoban cksfv conglomerate
duplicity freedroidrpg galculator gdeskcal gkrellm-themes gnofract4d
gnome-password-generator gnome-telnet gnome-themes-extras gnugo gonvert gpa
gtkglarea2 gurlchecker hping2 libnet10 libzvt lincvs lua manedit meld mknbi
netdiag nget ots p0f parchive perl-Net-SCP perl-Net-SSH perl-Parse-Yapp
prozilla putty rpmproc scorched3d screem sirius synaptic tdl tetex-arabtex
tetex-armtex tetex-font-tipa tetex-lgrind tla wbxml2 wesnoth xmms-cdread xtide
We have 93 packages not available in extras devel:
GiNaC R-RScaLAPACK R-hdf5 alsa-firmware amavisd-new apmud aqhbci-qt-tools
buildsystem cdiff cdo compat-wxPythonGTK2 comps configure-thinkpad cryptplug
dd_rescue drscheme ebtables fftw2 fillets-ng-data-cs freenx gcdmaster gcl
gconfmm20 general gnome-applet-netmon gnome-cpufreq-applet
gnome-theme-clearlooks gpredict gtkmm20 iiimf-le-simplehangul initng inti juk
k3b-ape kiosktool kxdocker kxdocker-resources libgcrypt1 libglademm20
libgnomecanvasmm20 libgnomemm20 libgnomeuimm20 libgsf113 libmatchbox libsafe
lirc-kmod lirc-kmod-common lout nabi newpg nx openbox opendap
openoffice-extras osiv pam_pkcs11 perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo perl-Class-Loader
perl-Convert-ASCII-Armour perl-Convert-PEM perl-Crypt-DES_EDE3 perl-GD-SVG
perl-Graph perl-Heap perl-Parse-CPAN-Packages perl-SOAP-Lite perl-SVG
perl-Text-Levenshtein perl-Text-Shellwords perl-XML-Writer perl-bioperl
php-pear-DB php-pecl-sqlite qemu rsnapshot sblim-cmpi-base scrub smb4k
squidGuard stripesnoop superkaramba swish-e tetex-beamer tetex-pgf
tetex-xcolor thinkpad-kmod thinkpad-kmod-common tpctl wmweather+ wp_tray
wxPython xaliclock yakuake
We have 27 packages that moved to core:
anthy firefox gmime kasumi libchewing libevent m17n-db m17n-lib
nautilus-sendto perl-Archive-Zip perl-IO-String perl-IO-Zlib perl-Net-IP
perl-String-CRC32 perl-XML-Simple python-elementtree python-sqlite scim
scim-anthy scim-chewing scim-hangul scim-m17n scim-pinyin scim-qtimm
scim-tables sqlite thunderbird
=== About FE-ACCEPT packages ===
We have 10 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find
the package in the development repo:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165488,168185,171601,172136,172144,172150,172151,173216,174266,179444
We have 5 accepted, closed packages where I'm unable to find
the package in the owners file:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=165992,167863,168185,168920,171801
We have 464 accepted, closed package reviews
Top 10 BZ review requests submitters:
tcallawa at redhat dot com : 43
rc040203 at freenet dot de : 41
andreas dot bierfert at lowlatency dot de : 29
fedora dot wickert at arcor dot de : 28
jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 24
rdieter at math dot unl dot edu : 18
pertusus at free dot fr : 14
orion at cora dot nwra dot com : 13
paul at city-fan dot org : 12
ivazquez at ivazquez dot net : 12
Top 10 BZ review requests reviewers:
paul at city-fan dot org : 64
gauret at free dot fr : 63
gdk at redhat dot com : 34
jpmahowald at gmail dot com : 28
tcallawa at redhat dot com : 26
rc040203 at freenet dot de : 22
jpo at di dot uminho dot pt : 20
ed at eh3 dot com : 19
adrian at lisas dot de : 18
ville dot skytta at iki dot fi : 13
We have 11 accepted, open package reviews where the package
appears to already be in the repo...
All open packages already available:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=166207,166251,166252,166253,166254,168905,176618,177038,177083,177166,179263
=== About FE-NEW packages ===
We have 9 closed tickets still blocking FE-NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=167621,168906,177272,177274,177662,177859,178141,178902,179039
=== About FE-REVIEW packages ===
We have 1 closed tickets still blocking FE-REVIEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=172267
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list