Fedora Extras RPMs should have Vendor and Packager?

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:29 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> I just was doing rpm -qi on a few packages, and noticed that packages 
> built in Extras don't have a vendor associated with them.
> 
> Not that anybody ever really looks at these things, but we should 
> probably set up the extras build system so that it prefills the vendor 
> pertaining to Fedora somehow.  We might also want to add "Packager"

You're not wrong, but currently mock and plague don't have the ability
to define Packager dynamically. Fortunately Vendor is a lot easier and
should require only a small change in the mock configuration files in
order to set it to "Fedora Extras".

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060201/652ddcf2/attachment.sig>