[Bug 179758] New: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 2 17:54:56 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758
Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor)
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info
ReportedBy: fedora at adslpipe.co.uk
QAContact: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
Spec Url: http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel.spec
SRPM Url: http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel/eiciel-0.9-4.src.rpm
Description:
Eiciel is a graphical editor for access control lists
either as an extension within nautilus, or as a standalone utility.
Notes:
This is my first package, so I thoroughly expect you to easily be able
to pull holes in it ;-) Comments gratefully received, hints even more gratefully received.
One step which I don't know how to handle at the moment, after installing the RPM you need to "killall nautilus" so that it picks up the new extensions, obviously it wouldn't be particularly friendly to do that in a post script!
I've only built and run it on rawhide x86_64 so far, can't install an i386 machine until rawhide is in a better mood.
I've done an rpmlint on it, two errors, one warning
E: eiciel standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man
E: eiciel standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1
I tried to fix the errors by changing the %files under %{_mandir} but it doesn't seem to have helped.
W: eiciel devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libeiciel-nautilus.a
I'm not sure if the warning is significant, I can't see having an eiciel-devel package being very likely, should the .a file stay or go, or the warning be ignored?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list