[Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor)
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 3 14:55:41 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758
------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2006-02-03 09:55 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I presume that because %doc matches all the files under /usr/share/doc it's best
> to remove my (currently commented) %{_datadir}/doc/eiciel*/*
Yes.
> Similarly I believe that RPM is clever enough to work out the Requires: for
> itself, so my commented Requires: should be removed too? Or if it's not so
> clever as I've assumed I should check more closely the actual Requires:
Look at the dependencies of your built package:
$ rpm -qp --requires /path/to/eiciel*.x86_64.rpm
There should be dependencies for the required shared libraries, normally
satisfied by the libacl, libattr, and gnome-vfs2 packages, so there should be no
need to explictly require these packages.
> I only get a -debuginfo package produced on x86_64, does that indicate a problem?
Maybe you don't have redhat-rpm-config installed on your i386 system?
> All files refreshed to http://adslpipe.co.uk/fedora/extras/eiciel
>
> I think I should go through a typical review checklist in a "muttering to
> myself" fashion ...
That's always a good idea.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list