Povray, fedora extras and licensing
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Fri Feb 3 16:43:17 UTC 2006
Greg DeKoenigsberg (gdk at redhat.com) said:
> > BTW: Debian has povray-3.5 in "stable", but classifies it as "non-free".
>
> Yep.
>
> >From the reactions I've heard so far, sounds like a big "no" to me -- and
> it brings up a good question: is it reasonable to consider a similar
> "non-free" repo for things like this that are (a) explicitly
> redistributable, but (b) not free?
>
> Not sure how I stand on that.
Hm, well, I could see something like that being useful, for, say, firmware.
Bill
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list