[Bug 174588] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gpe
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 5 08:02:27 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gpe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174588
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-02-05 03:02 EST -------
Minor:
- warnings while building:
gpesync_client.c: In function 'write_command':
gpesync_client.c:70: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
gpesync_client.c: In function 'gpesync_client_open':
gpesync_client.c:248: warning: ignoring return value of 'pipe', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
gpesync_client.c:249: warning: ignoring return value of 'pipe', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
It'd be nice if these went away and we could use -Werror again. File a bug upstream.
- %description too long
rpmlint of libopensync-plugin-gpe-devel-0.18-1.i386.rpm:E:
libopensync-plugin-gpe-devel description-line-too-long The
libopensync-plugin-gpe-devel package contains the files needed for development
rpmlint of libopensync-plugin-gpe-devel-0.18-1.i386.rpm:E:
libopensync-plugin-gpe-devel description-line-too-long The
libopensync-plugin-gpe-devel package contains the files needed for development
Good:
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC4 i386
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r
Fixup the %description and this is APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list