extras maintainence
Dennis Gilmore
dennis at ausil.us
Fri Feb 10 15:01:34 UTC 2006
Hi all,
Some people are waiting to make fc3 extras end of life. I personally have a
huge interest in fc3 extras not become stale and unmaintained. I have
rebuilt all of extras for Aurora SPARC Linux* (except a few packages that
have not built successfully)
Aurora's latest build is based on fc3 which is why i have based the extras
packages on the same. It is currently in beta status so i will be
maintaining extras packages for awhile. I can understand that some
maintainers do not want to support fc3 anymore. however I personally
believe we should maintain support at least until Fedora Legacy no longer
supports fc3 alot of users that use legacy will have extras packages
installed also. for example i have 3 servers running fc3 at work and i have
a file/ asterisk server at home running fc3. I use clamav and amavisd-new
on the ones at work.
What does this mean? extras and core need to be considered as one not two
entities, both needing maintainence for the same period of time
how do we do this? We have two options,
one) existing package maintainers need to maintain there packages until legacy
no longer supports a release. but a stipulation could be made that once a
release moves to legacy the only updates in extras are bugfixes and security
related.
two) we create an extras legacy team, who would then take over
maintainership of all extras packages once a release moves to legacy.
though if a package maintainer wanted to continue support of his/her packages
that would be beneficial.
So which way are we going to move forward
--
Regards
Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
Proud Australian
* http://www.auroralinux.org
* http://fedoramirror.net
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list