Package with no "upstream" source - clamav-exim
Jochen Schmitt
Jochen at herr-schmitt.de
Thu Feb 16 14:52:06 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:34:59 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm reviewing clamav-exim
>(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181450)
>
>This is essentially some wrapper scripts and configuration files for
>setting up a clamav daemon for exim. So:
>
>- Do we need an COPYING file with the GPL license? Or are all the
>provided Source files assumed to be GPL?
>
>- Is a package with no upstream source acceptable? (I would think so,
>but...)
- From my point of view you should include a COPYING file with the
verbatin GPL to clarify the license terms of the files which are
dstribute with your package.
I you case you are the packager and the upstream author in the
same person.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2424)
iQA/AwUBQ/SRvk9gByurcX4MEQIFTgCg3akN0KP1WE52dsG6whhTmqOn3y4AoJuU
zpjsITWMpTCuglUeuBFMnyYX
=s7L4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list