Packaging review guidelines clarification

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 10:34 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> The point could be made that mock should remain a should because if it
> does fail, its not getting in FE anyway until its fixed.
>
> //devils advocate.
Not quite - The question would be: Why does mock fail?

If it's because a BR: is missing then it wouldn't be a biggy, but if
it's because a package is missing or has changed in FC or FE, then the
review process has failed.

Ralf