[Bug 180345] Review Request: ser - Sip Express Router

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ser - Sip Express Router


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180345





------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru  2006-02-16 16:23 EST -------
> About the different packages:
> But about the jabber, cpl-c and pa modules, I'm not so sure. All they depend 
> on are libxml2, expat and pthread.

I think that in any case it's a generally a good idea to split a package into a 
subpackages especialy if authors provide plugin-mechanism for their 
application. I personally prefer splitting to as many packages as could. Why 
break modularization and provide one big rpm?

Actually, I think that the question must be "why not to split SER into 
subackages" rather than "why split...?" :)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.