static libs ... again

[Rex Dieter]

Ed Hill wrote:

> Is there is a middle ground in this static libs discussion?
> 
> For instance, are there technical solutions such as:
> 
>  - all static libs should or perhaps must be in a -static 
>      sub-package

IMO, no point.  If a packager really wants them, put 'em in -devel.

>  - no -static sub-packages are allowed as BuildRequires for 
>      other FC or FE packages

In general, agreed.

>  - the -static packages are strictly optional so maintainers 
>      may provide them or not at their own discretion

I'd argue the general rule should be that static libs be omitted, unless 
there is (very) good reason to include otherwise.

-- Rex