static libs ... again
Paul Howarth
paul at city-fan.org
Sat Feb 18 10:45:52 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 21:38 -0500, Ed Hill wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Is there is a middle ground in this static libs discussion?
>
> For instance, are there technical solutions such as:
>
> - all static libs should or perhaps must be in a -static
> sub-package
> - no -static sub-packages are allowed as BuildRequires for
> other FC or FE packages
Wouldn't this be a problem for building lib-A-static, which depends on
lib-B-static? Without a BR of lib-B-static, lib-A-static would be
dynamically linked to lib-B, rather defeating the purpose of having
lib-A-static? Or am I horribly confused?
Paul.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list