[Bug 182175] Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable  functions (needed by eterm)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175


Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |182173
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de  2006-02-21 12:33 EST -------
Further Bads:

- BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
- The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install
? Encoding should be UTF-8
- Test of /sbin/ldconfig in %post and %pustun is unnecessary.
- Static libs in devel package.
- Missing text of the license in %doc.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.