Review Rules and staticly linked packages agains dietlibc

[Hans de Goede]

Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:17 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
>> rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes:
>>
>>> As a compromise, I could be persuaded to agree to dynamical linkage against
>>> dietlibc, but statical linkage against dietlibc is non-acceptable to me.
>> Dynamical linkage in dietlibc is highly experimental, is not supported
>> on all archs and you gain absolutely nothing in the current 'ipsvd'
>> case.
> You still don't seem to have understood: I say, there should not be any
> room for dietlibc in any LINUX distribution - I'd consider to file a
> request for removal, but unless dietlibc starts to infect my systems,
> it's not worth the hassle of fighting.
> 

Considering this discussion and the fact that this will create a 
precedence I say that it is worth fighting, what is the procedure for 
requesting removal?

Regards,

Hans