owners owners.list,1.500,1.501

[Chris Chabot]

Ummm well as one being guilty of the same crime (as you can see in the
change below) i can tell you that there is one thing that made it
difficult for me:

No one mentioned that it should be in alphabetical order! Nor is it in
the comments inside the file.. 

Its only after doing a cvs commit that i realized the current packages
listed in the owners list showed every sign of being sorted by name, but
i didn't know if it was worth creating more cvs commit spam to rectify
the situation..

Maybe worth putting a notice in the owners file and/or in the
NewPackageProcess wiki page about the alphabetical order thing? Would
help keep new contributers from having to undergo this embarrassment :-)

	-- Chris Chabot

On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:04 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 08:56 -0500, Matthias Haase wrote:
> > Author: endur
> > 
> > Update of /cvs/extras/owners
> > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7214
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> > 	owners.list 
> 
> > @@ -1339,3 +1339,4 @@
> >  Fedora Extras|zope|Application server in Python|gauret at free.fr|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|
> >  Fedora Extras|zziplib|Lightweight library to easily extract data from zip files|matthias at rpmforge.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|
> >  Fedora Extras|buoh|Online comics reader|chabotc at xs4all.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|
> > +Fedora Extras|streamtuner|A stream directory browser|endur at bennewitz.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|
> 
> WHAT exactly is so difficult about keeping this file in alpha order?
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060106/6844fc32/attachment.sig>