Mono in Extras

[Roozbeh Pournader]

On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 11:18 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Sounds like a plan. The problem is what the FC developers consider
> should be in extras and what is in core. For example, would monodoc and
> monodevelop be core or extras? Arguments can be made both ways.

We can ask them. If they want to ship it in Code, let them do that and
don't get into arguments. If they don't, we can ship them in Extras.

roozbeh