Question about licence for "boost" libraries
Chris Chabot
chabotc at xs4all.nl
Thu Jan 12 20:12:44 UTC 2006
Yep two other people on the list pointed this out to me earlier today,
but thanks :-)
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 12:48 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Chris Chabot <chabotc at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > Some package i was trying to give a review has a much newer upstream
> > version available, however it requires the "boost filesystem" libraries
> > to function (c++ libs)
>
> Uhm.. you realise that boot is already a part of Fedora Core right?
>
> on my fc4 system yum list "*boost*"
> Available Packages
> boost.i386 1.33.0-3.fc4 updates-testing
> boost-debuginfo.i386 1.33.0-3.fc4 updates-testing
> boost-devel.i386 1.33.0-3.fc4 updates-testing
> boost-doc.i386 1.33.0-3.fc4 updates-testing
>
> -jef"I don't understand the point of this question."spaleta
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060112/ff9bdf0d/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list