[Bug 177944] Review Request: alsamixergui : GUI mixer for ALSA sound devices
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 16 21:54:25 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsamixergui : GUI mixer for ALSA sound devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177944
chabotc at xs4all.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2006-01-16 16:54 EST -------
Review list MUST items:
- Builds cleanly on FC5 devel.
- rpmlint has no output / complaints
- Source included matches upsteam source (md5sum)
- Package name meets guidelines
- spec file name is in %{name}.spec format
- Licence (BSD-ish?) is fedora extra's compatible & is included in spec
- Spec file is in (american) english
- Does not list buildrequires that are excepted in the package guidelines
- Missing BR: desktop-file-utils, mock failed because of it.
With adding that BR, it mock builds properly.
- No need for ldconfig
- All files have proper permissions
- Package is not relocatable
- No duplicate files in %files section
- No missing files in %files section
- Has a proper %clean section with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Uses macro's described in PackagingGuidelines
- No entries in %doc that are required for standard program operation
- No -devel package needed
- No directory-ownerships needed
Review list SHOULD items:
- Includes upstream licence file (COPYING)
- No insane scriplets
- No unnescesarry requires
FE-ACCEPT, but under the assumption you will add that BR for desktop-file-utils
before commiting to cvs!
Please assign the bug to me on closing it per procedure.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list