Extras updates for FC3 and older? (was: Re: Mono package policy)

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:26 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:44:49 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:22 +0330, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:11 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > > > - that mono will not be considered for inclusion in Extras for FC-3/FC-4
> > > > until FC-5 goes GOLD.
> > > 
> > > FC3 will be unsupported when FC5 test2 comes out. Should we still allow
> > > new FC3 packages in extras after that?!
> > 
> > It's at the maintainer's discretion. Note that FE currently has some
> > packages with branches going all the way back to RHL9.
> 
> No. Fedora Extras is only for FC3 and above. The older branches are
> fedora.us stuff.

Nonetheless there is sufficient metadata in CVS for them. The
buildsystem is another issue though.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060117/ea42ac2c/attachment.sig>