[Bug 166796] Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 19 19:02:25 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166796
------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2006-01-19 14:02 EST -------
Thanks.
> W: cmucl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmucl/internals.h
Since cmucl *is* a compiler afterall, I think it's ok to include it here. (-:
> - The license.
Looks like a mix of PD and MIT. I'll fix that.
> - The spec includes two separate build methods. Are they both needed?
method 1: use included/internal cmucl for bootstrap
method 2: use (previous) rpm-built cmucl for bootstrap.
Obviously, at least the first iteration for inclusion in Extras will have to be
method 1.
> - rpmlint complains "W: cmucl-extras no-documentation"
I'll see if I can find some. (-:
> - ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} - Is there no portability at all to x86_64 or PPC?
Yes, no. It can theoretically work, but there's no bootstrap binary available
from upstream, nor do I have any x86_64 or ppc box of my own to attempt to make one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list