[Bug 166796] Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166796





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-01-19 14:22 EST -------
> Since cmucl *is* a compiler afterall, I think it's ok to include it here. (-:

I would tend to agree; I wonder why rpmlint doesn't complain about gcc which
does the same thing.  Ahhh, it has a specific exception.

> method 1: use included/internal cmucl for bootstrap
> method 2: use (previous) rpm-built cmucl for bootstrap.
> 
> Obviously, at least the first iteration for inclusion in Extras will have to
> be method 1.

I see.  Do you plan to switch it over once the package is included?

> > - ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} - Is there no portability at all to x86_64 or PPC?
> 
> Yes, no.  It can theoretically work, but there's no bootstrap binary available
> from upstream, nor do I have any x86_64 or ppc box of my own to attempt to
> make one.

I can give you an account on an x86_64 machine if you like, but I can't help you
with PPC.

I think the requires-on-release is fixed by replacing the

Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

lines by

Requires: %{name} = %{version}

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.