[Bug 177507] Review Request: pida

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pida


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177507





------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info  2006-01-21 10:48 EST -------
- This
>Requires:   python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]")
is not needed anymore -- works automatically in FC4 and later
- Don't repeat the name of the package in the beginning of the summary
- The license doesn't look like GPL
- Description needs a linebreak after 80 chars
- Description might be a bit to long
- Change
Requires:   desktop-file-utils
to
BuildRequires:   desktop-file-utils
- In the future please add versions in the changelog entrys
- why "Release: 0.2" and not "Release: 2"?
- saw those warnings when starting pida:
which: no pydoc in
(/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin)
which: no xemacs in
(/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/home/rpmbuild/usr/bin:/home/rpmbuild/server/usr/bin)
Are they relevant?
- In the future please upload the srpms somewhere to the web and post only post
links to it -- don't attach the packages in bugzilla

(In reply to comment #5)
> list of known issues:
> - usually bicyclerepair would be required to load the python plugins but i left
> the dependencys out since the plugins (browser/profiler/debugger) dont load
> anyways. (will be fixed with 0.3.0)

I would add it nevertheless 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.