[Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 13:48:00 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438
------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2006-01-26 08:47 EST -------
> Good to know there is a policy about this. Kevin Kofler, can you say if
> there's also policy for the gui package name issue and the rpm version
> number issue? A policy would define what to do here so we would not have
> to argue about this matter.
I don't think there is, otherwise it would have been brought up already by the
people knowing more than me. ;-)
> - Shouldn't smart-usermode obsolete smart-update and not ksmarttray? I
> might be wrong but if you just read the decriptions you get that impression.
Other ksmarttray packages are linked against smart-update, so doing what you
suggest could cause conflicts. Obsoleting it in ksmarttray doesn't have that
problem.
> - Same goes for "install". Perhaps use the macro instead?
>
> - You use "touch" there. Shouldn't you require /bin/touch then? Or is there a
> macro for it instead?
>
> - You use "test" there. The same thing here. Either there is a macro or you
> should require "/usr/bin/test".
I think these are base tools which can be assumed to just be there.
> - You use "gtk-update-icon-cache". Shouldn't you require
> "/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache" then?
That makes sense (if it isn't already being required - it's part of the gtk2
package), it should be a Requires(post) though.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list