[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 26 15:10:00 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-01-26 10:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> lets assume we go ahead various versions of asterisk... and how high do you 
> eval the chance the the old config will be broken in newer releases? in my eyes 
> if they werent changed by the user they should really be replaced by the new 
> versions default configs. i am not sure if theres a policy regarding that or 
> not.

%config(noreplace) does not mean that unedited config files will not be replaced
- they will. The difference in behaviour between %config and %config(noreplace)
comes in when the user has edited the config file. With %config, the user's
edited file will be renamed to file.rpmsave and the new package's config file
will take its place. With %config(noreplace), the user's edited file will be
left alone and the new package's file will be installed as file.rpmnew.

%config(noreplace) should generally be used for config files unless there's a
good reason not to use (noreplace).



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list