Packaging/Review Guidelines change

[Kevin Fenzi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "Dariusz" == Dariusz J Garbowski <thuforuk at yahoo.co.uk> writes:

>> An example I have of this is the munin package. There is a main
>> 'munin' package that is only installed on a collector machine, and
>> then a 'munin-node' subpackage thats installed on all the nodes you
>> want to monitor. Either one or both could be installed on any given
>> machine. They both use /var/lib/munin/ to store state and
>> /var/log/munin/ to store logs. So, they both need to own those
>> directories. One thing worth noting in this case is that both
>> packages should have the same permissions and ownership. Otherwise
>> the last package installed will override the previous package,
>> possibly leading to maddness and chaos. :)

Dariusz> I have been hit by this. Here's bugzilla:

Dariusz> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176529

yeah. Did the update on 2005-12-24 fix the issues you saw? 
If so, we should close that bug. ;) 

Everything looks fine with all my testing. 

Dariusz> Regards, Dariusz

kevin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQFDvdlz3imCezTjY0ERAp2cAJ4wEFQPxDaZimtW9+A2u2O3S102xACgkg6d
APhiRfUVJ4QdyxRNNXN4LfQ=
=u54S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----