[Bug 176617] Review Request: libupnp

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libupnp


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176617





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-01-08 11:04 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Why libupnp.so is in devel package and in libupnp package ?

This is normal (versioned library in main library, unversioned in -devel
subpackage), e.g.

$ rpm -ql libusb-devel | grep so
/usr/lib/libusb.so
/usr/lib/libusbpp.so
$ rpm -ql libusb | grep so
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4
/usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.2
/usr/lib/libusbpp-0.1.so.4
/usr/lib/libusbpp-0.1.so.4.4.2

It's also a MUST according to the package review guidelines
(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines):

MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.