Question about licence for "boost" libraries

[Chris Chabot]

Ah and so it is, the broken yum headers/checksums fooled me into
thinking it wasn't

Thanks :-)

On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:57 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Chris Chabot wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Is it safe and ok to package this for Fedora? Seems to be a much more
> >>free licence, and allows distribution of the source/compiled package, so
> >>should be ok right?
> > 
> > 
> > boost itself is in either core or extras, I do not know which.
> 
> boost is in Core.
> 
> -- Rex
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060112/d72c6e22/attachment.sig>