[Bug 177635] Review Request: libtorrent

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jan 14 18:38:18 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libtorrent


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177635


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com              |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-01-14 13:38 EST -------
The formal review steps:

MUST review items:
- Builds cleanly on FC5 devel.
- rpmlint has no output / complaints
- Source included matches upsteam source (md5sum)
- Package name meets guidelines
- spec file name is in %{name}.spec format
- Licence (GPL) is fedora extra's compatible & is included in spec
- Spec file is in (american) english
- Does not list buildrequires that are excepted in the package guidelines
- All build dependencies are listed
- Proper use of ldconfig
- All files have proper permissions
- Package is not relocatable
- No duplicate files in %files section
- No missing files in %files section
- Has a proper %clean section with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- Uses macro's described in PackagingGuidelines
- No entries in %doc that are required for standard program operation
- Proper -devel package
- No .la files
- Package owns directories properly

Should items:
- Includes upstream licence file (COPYING)
- No insane scriplets, or scriplets at all
- No unnescesarry requires

Looks good to me, changing blockerbug to FE-ACCEPT and assigning to me.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list