[Bug 166796] Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166796





------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu  2006-01-19 14:02 EST -------
Thanks.

> W: cmucl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmucl/internals.h

Since cmucl *is* a compiler afterall, I think it's ok to include it here. (-:

> - The license.

Looks like a mix of PD and MIT.  I'll fix that.

> - The spec includes two separate build methods.  Are they both needed?

method 1: use included/internal cmucl for bootstrap
method 2: use (previous) rpm-built cmucl for bootstrap.

Obviously, at least the first iteration for inclusion in Extras will have to be
method 1.

> - rpmlint complains "W: cmucl-extras no-documentation"

I'll see if I can find some.  (-:

> - ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} - Is there no portability at all to x86_64 or PPC?

Yes, no.  It can theoretically work, but there's no bootstrap binary available
from upstream, nor do I have any x86_64 or ppc box of my own to attempt to make one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.