[Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438





------- Additional Comments From jarkko at saunalahti.fi  2006-01-23 17:59 EST -------
There are both names out there in the repo, -gui and -gtk. There seems to be a
"policy" that frontends are usually named as -gui when libraries are named as
-gtk. There are some frontends which are named as -gtk though, but those seem to
have their executable also named like that. All (or at least majority of)
graphical frontend packages seem to be named as -gui.

I'd like to follow that "policy" here. Especially when the gui is launched with
the command "smart --gui". (I know the interface dir is named as "gtk" but I
think it would be more consistent to follow the visible side of it.)

Just wanted to try to convince you more and explain why we others request the
name change.

Other than this, I'd say the spec is ok. Do others still want to bring
smart-usermode to the main package? I really think that it is perfect like it is
now because smart-usermode will be installed with the graphical packages
automatically as dependencies. And we don't want to add unnecessary deps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.