[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 177082] Review Request: wm-icons



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wm-icons


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177082





------- Additional Comments From luya_tfz thefinalzone com  2006-01-25 13:10 EST -------
+ mock succesfully build the source RPM

- Source0 should list the full path of URL: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 should
be, for example, http://wm-icons.sourceforge.net/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2

- Changelog has a typo: 
" * Fri Jan 06 2006 James Lawrence <fedorajim gmail com> 0.4.0-3.FC4
- modified spec file removed FC4 from release line "
You mean version 0.3.0-3?

- rpmlint generated these errors:
W: wm-icons non-standard-group X11/Window Managers
W: wm-icons incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-3.FC4 0.3.0-3
E: wm-icons no-binary
W: wm-icons symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/menu
/usr/share/icons/wm-icons/16x16-general
E: wm-icons zero-length /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/16x16-kde/_symlinks.lst
W: wm-icons symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/norm
/usr/share/icons/wm-icons/48x48-general
E: wm-icons standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons
W: wm-icons devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/wm-icons-config
W: wm-icons symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/wm-icons/mini
/usr/share/icons/wm-icons/14x14-general


Could you make sure to do both md5sum and sha1sum on source tarball for both
SRPM and the downloaded tarball you received? These methods are used for
security process.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]